Skip to main content

The Truth About Universal Health Care


Last year, the US spent $3.2 trillion on health care. The US has roughly 323.1 million residents. That means we spent about $9904.05 per person last year. In 2016, the median household income was $59,039. There are an estimated 2.58 people per household in the US. So, that means that each household spent roughly $25,552.45 on medical expenses last year. So, that means that 43.28% of the median household income was spent on health care. That is an extreme amount. Any one who denies that isn’t paying attention. But we need to take something into account: that $9904.05 per person was not spent entirely out of pocket. Not even close. That is mostly covered by insurance companies and state and federal governments paying for the coverage. In actuality, households only account for 27.7% of spending when it came to health care in 2015. So, if that percentage stayed the same for 2016, we are looking at roughly $7,078.03 per household, or $2,743.42 per person. That means that each household only spent about 11.99% of their total income on health care.
Now, lets look at the overall federal spending on health care currently. In 2015, the federal government was responsible for 28.7% of spending for health care. If that same percentage carried over to 2016, the fed spent $918.4 billion on all forms of health care. With Sanders’ plan, that means the fed would add on an additional $2.282 trillion of health care spending every year. In 2015, the federal budget was $3.8 trillion. So, if the annual budget and annual cost of health care stay the exact some from here on out, that means the fed will be spending $6.082 trillion each year. In 2015, the fed brought in roughly $3.18 trillion in tax revenue. That means that the fed spent $620 billion more than what they brought in.
So, in order to pay for Universal Health Care, we would need to double the tax rate. The current tax rate is about 31.5%. As of 2016, the median personal income was $31,099. At a tax rate of 31.5%, that means the average person only pocketed $21,302.82 annually. So, if we double the tax rate to 63%, that means the average person only pockets $11,506.63 annually.
Now, many will claim that he’ll tax the rich and not the middle class and lower. Well, hate to tell ya, but only 0.49% of the US population makes over $500,000 a year. And any one who makes more than $418,400 is taxed at a 39.6% tax rate which means they would then be taxed at a 79.2% rate. And, by the way, the 1% paid for 45.7% of the tax revenue in 2014. Seriously. Yeah, 1% of the population paid about $1.453 trillion in taxes. Anyone who says the 1% hasn’t been paying their fair share clearly hasn’t looked at the numbers.
So, there it is: a break down of how much we would have to spend to make Universal Health Care a thing. Sanders' plan would double the tax rate of all people or add $22.82 trillion in debt over the next ten years all on its own. Pretty staggering.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KKK History Lesson

For some reason, recently, people have been associating the KKK with Republicans and BLM with Democrats. This is all propaganda that is being fed to us. Here’s a little history lesson and an explanation of why: Both the KKK and BLM were created by Democrats. You didn't expect me to say that did you? Actually, the KKK wasn't started to be a black and white thing. The original targets of the Ku Klux Klan were Republicans, both black and white. For decades the KKK harassed the GOP with lynchings and threats. An estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,297 whites died at the end of KKK ropes from 1882 to 1964. Republicans often led the efforts to pass federal anti-lynching laws and their platforms consistently called for a ban on lynching. Democrats successfully blocked those bills and their platforms never did condemn lynchings. Further, the first grand wizard of the KKK was honored at the 1868 Democratic National Convention, no Democrats voted for the 14th Amendment to g

Health Insurance vs Health Care

     Everyone is arguing about health insurance these days and most don't even understand what they're arguing about.  There's a reason for that.  This is a complicated mess.      Before Obamacare (ACA) our system was set up so that the poor had Medicaid, the elderly and disabled had Medicare, and the people still in the workforce could purchase their insurance from whatever company they wanted to within their state.  Of course, a lot of people also had insurance through their employers.      So, who are the 22,000,000 people that Democrats say will lose insurance if we repeal Obamacare?  Are they the people that can work and get their own instead of using taxpayer money?  Are they the people that don't even want it but are being mandated to buy it?  Who exactly are these people?  The truth is that 16,000,000 or 73% don't even want it.  They have it because their only other choice is to pay a fine and they figure they might as well get something for their money